1783 - Aft 1830 (> 48 years)
-
Name |
David AUSTIN |
Birth |
23 Aug 1783 |
VA |
Gender |
Male |
Death |
Aft 1830 |
Notes |
- (1) Source: John Clinard .
(2) "Austins of White County Tennessee," Compiler: Liz Austin Carlin, Genealogy Content Copyright © 2013 Austin Families Association of America (genealogy may be freely distributed, but not sold in any form for profit):
David Austin
Sex: M
Born: 23 AUG 1783 at VA
Marriage
Children
Male Austin (1810/1815 - )
Parents
Father: Unknown Austin ( - )
Siblings
Josiah Austin (16 JAN 1770 - )
Elizabeth Austin (9 SEP 1772 - )
Lucy Austin (4 OCT 1774 - )
William Austin (23 DEC 1776 - )
John Austin (6 JAN 1779 - 27 FEB 1858)
Nathaniel Austin (8 FEB 1781 - 27 SEP 1869)
David Austin (23 AUG 1783 - )
Hannah Austin (18 JAN 1786 - )
Robin Austin (10 JAN 1788 - )
Notes
BIRTHDATE: "List of children in family record of Henry (Frank?) Pleasant Austin, youngest son of Pleasant Austin, who purchased John Austin Sr.'s home" per Bess Austin Machtley. All said to have been born in Virginia. Recorded in AFAOA Tennessee Notebook A, page 282, White Co., TN. This list of children is recorded in a family Bible in the possession of Col. Jimmie L. Akin of Denver, Colorado and also a Bible in the possession of Sula Matthew Swafford of Georgia (a photocopy of this hand-written page is also kept in AFAOA Tennessee Notebook, White Co., TN).
TAXES: 1812 White County, Hickory Valley; 1825 White County - John Sr, John Jr, Nathaniel, David, William.
CENSUS: 1830 TN, White Co., 0-0-0-1-0-0-1 (male 40-50), 0-0-0-0-1 (female 20-30-).
POSSIBLE CHILDREN: John Austin and his brother James L. Austin (1st settlers of Livingston County, MO) have been attached to David's brother William, per AFAOA genealogist Liz Austin Carlin. There are several reasons for this.
1) Livingston County History faithfully records these two brothers as being from White County, TN, and several people in their line had erroneously attached them to John Austin and Rachel Denny. But John and Rachel already have a son John (who has a family).
2) In the period from about 1812-1830, there are four Austin brothers who appear in White County - John, Nathaniel, William and David. John and Nathaniel already have sons named John. In the 1830 White County, TN census data, David has one son of the right age. John has his own family in 1830. The 1830 census data shows that William does have sons of the right age.
3) From the above remarks, it's possible David could also be their father. David is shown on tax lists in Hickory Valley, White Co in 1812 and 1825, but has no 1820 White Co. census data. There is one David Austin in Western TN (the 1820 Eastern TN census was lost) in Dickson County, which could be the "White Co." David and he has sons the right age to be John and James L. Austin. The problem with the "Dickson Co." David is that in 1820 he has 10 children, 5 under 10 years old, and in 1830 White Co, David and his wife show only one son 15-20 yr.
More research is needed to definitely determine the parents of John and James L. Austin.
(3) The compiler has not found a household headed by David AUSTIN in the 1820 census of White County, TN. Therefore, if David was enumerated in the 1820 census of White County, TN, he was probably enumerated in a household headed by someone else.
The only household headed by a David AUSTIN which the compiler has found in the 1820 census of TN is a household headed by David AUSTIN in Dickson County, TN. However, the latter household, which is described in Note (1), above, does not seem to fit the profile of the household headed by David AUSTIN in the 1830 census of White County, TN.
(4) A household headed by David AUSTIN is listed in the 1830 census of White County, TN.
Listed in David's household are 1 free white male between 15 and 20 years of age; 1 free white male between 40 and 50 years of age; and 1 free white female between 20 and 30 years of age.
Assuming that David is the free white male listed in the 1830 census as then being between 40 and 50 years of age, he would have been born between 1780 and 1790, according to the 1830 census.
Assuming that David's wife is the free white female listed in the 1830 census as then being between 20 and 30 years of age, she would have been born between 1800 and 1810, according to the 1830 census.
Assuming that the other person in David's household is a child of David and/or his wife, that child would have consisted of a son (which son would have been born between born between 1810 and 1815, according to the 1830 census).
|
Person ID |
I26435 |
Frost, Gilchrist and Related Families |
Last Modified |
17 Apr 2024 |
|